![]() ![]() This study provides a theoretical basis for the public health and ecological significance of parasites transmitted by non-biting flies. Of the 27 reported parasites, a total of 20 known zoonotic parasites were identified, with an infection rate of 38.1% (95% CI 28.2–48.0% n = 13,572/28,494). ![]() The prevalence of parasites in the intestine of non-biting flies was 37.1% (95% CI 22.7–51.5% n = 1045/3817), which was significantly higher than the prevalence of parasites isolated from the body surface (35.1% 95% CI 20.8–49.4% n = 1199/3649 P < 0.01). domestica), the fly species considered to be the most closely associated with humans and animals, were found with parasites. A total sample size of 28,718 non-biting flies reported in studies worldwide satisfied the predetermined selection criteria and was included in the quantitative analysis. MethodsĪ meta-analysis was carried out with the aim to review the global prevalence of parasite transmission in non-biting flies. In the present study, we performed a systematic overview of the different species of parasites carried by non-biting flies, as well as of isolation methods, different geographical distribution, seasonality and risk assessment. ![]() Non-biting flies such as the house fly ( Musca domestica), the Australian sheep blowfly ( Lucilia cuprina) and the oriental latrine fly ( Chrysomya megacephala) may carry many parasites. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |